In the minds of retail investors in the stock market, "banker" can almost be equated with the meaning of "enemy". Whether it is the slogan of "defeating the banker" or the concept of "following the banker strategy", the purpose is to hope that individual investors can become winners in their dealings with the banker. To deal with the 'enemy', of course, one must understand the 'enemy', study the 'enemy', and even learn from the 'enemy'. Otherwise, blindly maneuvering will only lead to rapid failure.

What can we learn from the banker?

Nowadays, many books and articles have exposed, disclosed, and analyzed the various strategies and tricks of market makers in trading. Therefore, we should undoubtedly learn and master as much as possible in order to better identify various complex trends and determine our own trading strategies in stock market practice.

But the stock market is like a chess game, so even though we are familiar with the strategies of many market makers, the probability of individual investors surpassing them to become winners is still very small, very small.

Why is that?

This is due to the characteristics and patterns of the stock market itself.

Because the stock market is not a static linear picture, but an active and highly stochastic game arena. In the stock market, there are no eternal hot topics or concepts, nor are there fixed formulas for profit or loss. Everything is changing, only the characteristics of 'change' remain unchanged.

When the banker used a certain strategy to make a lot of money, and after studying and researching, you believe that you have mastered the banker's strategy and can win the game steadily, in the next round of the game, the banker will use another technique to defeat you who stick to the old strategy, either losing or being trapped.

So, what can we learn from the banker?

It is not necessary to study and research the various trading strategies of the market makers. The key is to understand which things are only auxiliary "objectives" and not important "guidelines". 'Outline' is the main contradiction.

What is the "outline" in the strategy of market makers' trading? In other words, what should we learn the most from the banker?

There is a 'planned approach that includes contingency measures' in trading.

1、 Planned nature

What are you planning to do with this stock? What is the basic target price for raising the stock price? What is the controlling amount (depending on the size of one's own funds)? Which trading method should I choose? (Or aggressively sucking and pulling, exchanging funds for time to quickly end the battle; or slowly rising steadily, exchanging time for space; or both wanting watermelons and sesame seeds, constantly oscillating along the way while rising, and earning several price difference profits) and so on.

Everything was carefully considered beforehand, and the trading steps were meticulously planned. The so-called stock trading for market makers is just doing one thing step by step according to the plan. The blind risk that retail investors often have is basically not present in market makers.

2、 Response measures

Although the market maker has the initiative to control the rise and fall of a stock over a period of time and is engaged in his "planned economy", he can only play with small investors in the hands of the stock market, and never dare to play with the "big trend". This' trend 'includes the overall political and economic background, government policies, as well as the mentality of investors at that time, and so on.

Any well planned plan will inevitably encounter some sudden factors in practice. At this point, it is wise to adjust the method according to the original plan and adapt accordingly. And the banker usually determines as many of their various talents as possible in advance.

Some stocks are clearly showing a promising upward trend, steadily rising, and investors are optimistic and actively participating. However, halfway through, a sudden high diving occurred, and the gains of several months were all ruined within a few days. This is not because the market maker does not like stocks to continue rising, but rather because suddenly unfavorable factors appeared that conflicted with his trading plan. At this moment, the banker will not let the "plan" touch the sudden negative pressure full of risks. On the contrary, he will make the "plan" actively give way to risks and withdraw without fighting. Although only making small profits, one should still settle for safety and never take risks with their own money.

Chips, such stocks have the potential to bring significant returns to investors.